Trunp’s defence of failed judge Roy Moore is He denies it!
That’s it! Nine credible first-person witnesses — but Roy’s not guilty because he denies it.
Now how come other criminals never thought of that? Nine witnesses testify you robbed the bank? Just deny it!
Nine cops catch you with a baggie of weed? Just deny it!
Nine teachers catch you cheating on a test? Just deny it!
This is going to revolutionize the practice of criminal defence law. Just imagine if Charles Manson had thought if this? Or the sheik who organized the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center?
And — for the life of me — why didn’t Hillary Clinton just deny her 30,000 e-mails. I’m sure this would have shut down Donald trump